Recently I read this post, Marvel Movies: In a Class by Themselves by J.J. Adamson, and that forced me to gett off my lazy ass and write something I had meant to write for a long time.
Summing up, Adamson’s main points are that superhero movies cannot be considered proper art (I won’t get into that, though) and that there’s something inherently silly about the effort invested in making these movies, which he describes as fake. His example is Black Panther, which is, no matter how great the actors and director may be, still “fundamentally about a cool guy in a catsuit.“
That’s the kernel here, that there is a fundamental silliness to this entire genre, and that means that the superhero genre will never manage to reach that full potential some people expect them to achieve, and for the simple reason that superheroes (and I include here masked vigilantes like Batman) dumb up everything they touch. Whatever qualities these movies may have are not because of superheroes, but despite them. And no, I didn’t mistype, they don’t dumb down culture, they dump it up.
I have not come up with that term; I am, in fact, brazenly stealing it from this article on The Telegraph by Rhymer Rigby, where he described (in 2016) these movies as:
Films which are too dark for kids the comics were originally written for, yet too dumb for any thinking adult.
And he also comes up with this:
The trouble is the source material. In the case of Batman and Superman, this was originally written for ten-year-old boys. A man who can fly with lasers in his eyes. A man who dresses as a bat dispensing justice to bad guys.
In the 80s and 90s, people used to worry about “dumbing down”, where complex ideas in spheres like politics and literature were simplified in order to make them accessible to people who were unwilling or unable to deal with sophisticated thought (tellingly, the term originated in the film industry). These days, I’m more worried about dumbing up, where you take something that’s pretty stupid to begin with and then throw money and talent at it until it has a semblance of intelligence and sophistication.
Something like that is, I presume, what Adamson was trying to get at in his post. You have all these great actors in Black Panther, apparently a great story (I haven’t watched the movie, so I will have to take his word for it,) yet, at the end of the day, it’s still about people dressed in weird customes fighting over a city powered by magical crystals or minerals or somesuch. Basically, in an attempt to make the source material more sophisticated, they have manhandled the great themes it could potentially have, and dumbed them up by mixing them with what is an inherently silly concept.
Take, for example, the last Joker movie. I haven’t watched it, but I’m sure it’s a good movie. Some people claim it’s amazing, that it’s inspired by Taxi Driver or The Comedian, or that the actor playing the titular character should get an Oscar… Sure, all that is fine, but when all is said and done, it’s still a movie set in the same universe as Batman, the Penguin, Superman, and other weirdos in tights with improbable names and even less probable personal dramas or conflicts. In fact, I’d bet that if the movie is so good is also because it has barely anything related to the superhero genre and because barely anything from its original fictional universe (save the required minimum) is mentioned, almost as if those references were tacked on later to trick moviegoers (a tactic that has worked very well, if the box office records are anything to go by.)
So, the original source material is dumbed up, until it almost seems to become sophisticated. Still, because of that, the rest of the movie must necessarily suffer or be dragged down because if the film had nothing to do with the superhero genre but was instead completely based on our accepted reality (with, give or take, a few fantastic elements here and there—fantasy can occasionally enhance a good story,) it would obviously be much better and less constrained by artificial nonsense. You could make a movie about a nihilistc clow who inadvertely starts a revolution in the real world, and you (the writer) would have a lot more freedom, not to mention significance and meaning, if it were set on the real world, with real implications.
Many of these movies that have come up these past years, even (or especially) the good ones with “deep” messages and artistic pretensions, would clearly be much better if no superhero or masked vigilantes were involved. I don’t care what Christopher Nolan’s Batman movies say about surveillance or terrorism, or what would happen if masked (super)heroes were real, the point is that, fundamentally, they are movies about a playboy billionaire who dresses up as a bat and singlehandedly takes down criminals with ridiculous names like The Joker, The Penguin, and Scarecrow, who all live in a crazy city with a redundant asylum known as Arkham, where everything from psychotic serial killers to god-like beings are kept. And remember, within driving distance, there’s another city, Metropolis, with Clark “God Mode Always On” Kent flying around. I don’t think I need to explain why that alone drags down whatever depth or merits the movie may otherwise have.
Think I’m wrong? Ok, make this experiment: Think about any of the great books or movies considered cultural classics, and then throw superheroes in there, for example, by replacing, I don’t know, Michael Corleone from The Godfather by, let’s say, Crocman, who learned to dress as a crocodile during the Second World War to instill terror in his enemies, and Vito Corleone by Anaconda-Man, the Boss of a powerful criminal family at war with three other families, the Ratmen, the Penguins, and the Black Dogs (who all dress as their eponymous animals.) Don’t change more than is necessary; just make the protagonist superheroes doing superhero stuff in superhero clothing in a world where superheroes are a thing. The themes are the same, the dialogue may be the same… but you just ruined a perfectly good story for no discernable narrative, stylistic, or thematic gain. I’m trying to think of one, but aside from (perhaps?) cooler fighting scenes (and assuming coolness is a virtue in itself) there’s not a single thing I can think of that your story may gain by adding superhero elements on top of it.
And no, no superhero movie (entertaining or fun as it may be) says anything about anything of value or, at the very least, whatever they could say is distorted by being forced to pass through the dumbifying prism of the superhero genre and its wacky tropes. And Hollywood has thrown billions to make these movies. Some of the best actors and directors alive have given their best to try to make this genre almost artful (and it’s to their credit that apparently they have occasionally come close to that) but… at the end of the day, it’s still a story with weirdos in tights, flying around the world punching space aliens in the face, or personally fighting criminal masterminds dressed like lunatics. No ammount of grittiness or brown filters will change that. It may be fun, it may even make a good movie, but it is what it is, a very restricted genre that barely makes any sense the moment you think a bit about it.
Don’t take this the wrong way. I do not begrudge these movies’ existence, but I find it hard to believe that there is something so fundamentally great about the genre that it requires constant remakes, deconstructions, and Depp Commentary™ as if the future of our culture depended on them. I can’t even count the number of analyses of The Joker Youtube kept recommending me a few days ago, and I doubt there’s so much to say about it— although I’m sure there would be a bit more if the movie had nothing to do with Batmam or Gotham. It’s almost as if it is impossible for a certain generation or demographic to think about some issues or feel certain emotions if these have not been sifted through the sieve of superhero characters and tropes first, as if, from craddle to grave, these archetypical characters they first enjoyed as kids should be the mold through which any subsequent story at any stage of their lives should be told. I wonder if when these same moviegoers reach retirement age, they’ll be asking for movies about retired superheros too. I’m sure some will be great, but still…
Maybe I’m wrong, but I’m sure you can tackle a lot of issues without having to stuff your movie with superfreaks.