Decidir y nacionalismo

Contrariamente a lo que pueda parecer, ‘nacionalismo’ no es una palabra, es un verbo. Evidentemente, sé que gramaticalmente es un sustantivo, pero lo que quiero decir es que su esencia está en hacer algo. No es un objeto que se defina, es una acción, como una conversión religiosa, es algo que se hace a algo. El nacionalismo no se estudia; se hace, nacionalizando, creando conciencia de nación en la comunidad, etc. Una piedra es una piedra, sin necesidad de que haya alguien para arrojarla, pero no hay nacionalismo sin el proceso de nacionalizar.

Continue reading “Decidir y nacionalismo”

There is no such thing as a violent video game (III)

No image has ever created a massive war, ideology, or crime. Unless you count people who kill painters and artists because they are afraid of their power, of course. The simple truth is that words and language are the best, if not the only, means to communicate worldviews. Images, as propaganda, are useful to reinforce a previously held belief, make a joke, resume more complex ideas, or may be used as “infographics” to make a point. However, those images would not be useful if the observer had no previous idea or reference about what they are talking about. For example, an antisemitic cartoon that stereotypes Jews as blood-sucking vampires is only useful if the person who sees this has already heard about those accusations from other places (his parents, friends, the education system, journalists, etc.). To an alien from another planet, the cartoon would be incomprehensible or ridiculous.

Continue reading “There is no such thing as a violent video game (III)”